More thoughts on Fate Accelerated Edition

For the last couple of days I have been thinking a lot about Fate Accelerated Edition. Fate has always been a game I was quite excited about, but it’s definitely not what you would call rules-light. Most versions of Fate are actually pretty complex. Having to wrap your head around the rules, applying Aspects, Skills and Stunts properly can be a daunting task – especially for players and GMs unfamiliar with the rules.

Fate Accelerated looks a lot like it could be what I have been waiting for. It’s a streamlined version of Fate Core and is not much more complex than games like PDQ or even Risus. Skills are replaced by Approaches which makes it much easier to adapt the game to every setting imaginable. Overall the number of Aspects and Stunts a player character has, have been reduced, which makes creating a character easier and faster.

Fate Accelerated has no special rules for magic, equipment etc., so an attack with a gun works the same as an attack using a magic spell or using martial arts. Equipment usually doesn’t play a role at all, aside from gear you mention in your character’s Stunts or Aspects. I have to admit this is something I still have to get used to, but it sounds as if it could make things so much easier!

Thinking about Fate Accelerated and pondering what to do with it, is a lot of fun, but in the long run it’s not enough. Games are there to be played, not just read. Luckily I know at least two players who are very interested in Fate and would love to play in a game run by me. I fear scheduling a game might be an issue, but that doesn’t keep me from making plans.

The question remains what kind of campaign to run. Recently my interest in Shadowrun has increased slightly, probably because of the upcoming Shadowrun Returns computer game. Back in the 90s I ran Shadowrun regularly, but nowadays I can’t fathom how I could stand the rules back then. I guess I am just getting old. Even though I am not too fond of Shadowrun’s rules, I love the setting, especially the early 2050s era. It may feel a bit anachronistic in this day and age, but it has a certain “old-school” cyberpunk feel, I like. I am pretty sure that FAE can be used to run a Shadowrun game, if you focus on characters and story. Special gear, magic, etc. can easily be handled using appropriate Aspects and Stunts.

Alternatively I am also considering a more classic cyberpunk setting. Not everyone wants Elves and magic in their dystopian future. I think I mentioned before that I would love to use the setting from Deus Ex Human Revolution for a tabletop RPG. But I guess before making a final decision I’ll have to talk to my players first. But that doesn’t keep me from throwing a few ideas around. 😉

What I love about Fate Accelerated is that it’s so easy to apply the rules to basically any setting you can come up with – provided you are comfortable with the narrative play style Fate supports. So what are your plans with FAE? Do you want to run a game with it or is it not crunchy enough for your tastes? Please share your thoughts below.

Michael Wolf is a German games designer and enthusiast best known for his English language role-playing games blog, Stargazer's World, and for creating the free rules-light medieval fantasy adventure game Warrior, Rogue & Mage. He has also worked as an English translator on the German-language Dungeonslayers role-playing game and was part of its editorial team. In addition to his work on Warrior, Rogue & Mage and Dungeonslayers, he has created several self-published games and also performed layout services and published other independent role-playing games such as A Wanderer's Romance, Badass, and the Wyrm System derivative Resolute, Adventurer & Genius, all released through his imprint Stargazer Games. Professionally, he works as a video technician and information technologies specialist. Stargazer's World was started by Michael in August 2008.

4 comments

comments user
Bill

I’ve generally heard it stated that FAE seems to work best in settings where all of the characters are the same thing. So think Hogwarts where they are all student wizards. Or Green Lantern where they are all ring wielders. Then you aren’t dealing with questions of what the characters are capable of, instead you are focusing on how they go about using those powers.

    comments user
    Zooroos

    Well, Bill, it really depends on the focus that certain elements of the setting have on the mechanics. For example, I could easily imagine a dungeon-crawling game were every ‘niche’ of PCs’ roles are defined solely by their aspects. A wizard could forcefully blast their enemies with a fire ball, while the warrior could quickly dispatch a couple of mooks with swift strokes. With this example, what I’m trying to explain is: diversity of roles/powers and niche protection as subsystems are not mandatory in every game, even when emulating genres commonly known for that.

    Aspects actually provide the exact opposite of niche protection: it provides with ‘niche permisions’. Instead of restricting what a non-warrior can do with a weapon, for example, aspects provide justifications for a warrior to do really cool things with weapons and other martial tricks. And wizards can do so too, providing they have the appropriate aspect for it.

comments user
Zooroos

As for my plans for future FAE games, I’m looking to convert a current Risus game to FAE, and I’m also looking into the wonderful world of Uresia, by John S Ross (I’ve just discovered it, despite the fact that I’ve been playing Risus for years and even read BESM once, never realizing this setting).

And now you just make me want to run a shadowrun FAE game too! 🙂

comments user
Edward Lockhart

FAE is what I thought FATE should have been all along. It’s stripped down, rules-light, and all about characters & their stories. All the other versions seemed needlessly complex.

It seems that FAE would work just fine to run pretty much anything, so long as the focus was heavy on the characters & what defines them.

And suddenly I want to run a Rifts game with FAE. Did I just divide by zero?