Over in the Paizo Blog I’ve been reading with some interest their proposed changes to the Pathfinder Society Organized Play program. I have never participated on such programs. When I began role playing I was intrigued by the RPGA, joined and got their Polyhedron Magazine. I still have the laminated card and the pin somewhere, but besides reading the magazine I never took any advantage of belonging to the RPGA.
Fast-forward to the days of D&D 3rd edition and the changes they made to the RPGA. I loved the idea of Greyhawk being the default setting, the idea of regions assigned to geographical locations, etc. I even knew friend who were very active, but I never really joined. I had little free time, my campaigns, my adventures; I did not want to switch to a new campaign. I found all the excuses in the world, so that was that…
I took the DM tests the RPGA offered at one time (and passed), and when 4th ed. came along I wanted to be part of that, until I became disenchanted with the system and gave up on DDI. The Pathfinder Society had no presence where I lived so I didn’t pay much attention to it when I began playing the game.
Much has changed since then, I have been blogging for a while now, became active with promoting games in Puerto Rico, and wonder if I should try to participate in some of these organizations that promote and support gamers. I wonder, what have been your experiences? Did you benefit in any form from belonging to them? My inquiring mind wants to know.
Yesterday WotC has announced a new, web-based Character Builder for DDI subscribes. While a web-based solution may have some advantages and the screenshots look quite cool, I have some issues with that move by WotC. I haven’t had the chance to talk with our resident 4E fan about this, who has probably a better understanding of what the fans want, so take my musings with a grain of salt.
The new CB will make use of Microsoft’s Silverlight. Silverlight is basically Microsoft’s answer to Flash. While it obviously has some advantages when you’re a developer, it’s still a bad idea. IMHO it’s a transitional technology, it doesn’t run on Linux, and even Microsoft will probably focus on HTML5 in the future. Heck, even Flash would have been a better idea.
Cloud-based applications are pretty popular today, and I can clearly see why. It’s handy being able to access your data from every PC connected to the web. But that also raises privacy concerns. WotC already stated they will use data mining to find out what their customer create in the CB. What if WotC owns everything you created using their tools? Then D&D fans around the world provide their corporate masters with free characters all day! Yay!
IMO the new CB is just another ploy to bind people to DDI. You can’t use the CB when you’re offline and you can’t use it when you don’t have an active subscription. IMO the old CB, while not multi-platform, was more customer-friendly. Subscribers now can’t share the CB with their group without giving out their passwords. Another thing is missing features. The new CB will released with some features missing. While this is normally not a big deal and they already promised to add those features at a later date, WotC’s track report when it comes to fulfilling promises when DDI is concerned is less than stellar. Some of the DDI tools promised before even the game has been released are still missing.
Of course, WotC is free to pull the plug on the old CB, make unwise choices when it comes to the software used and announce features that never appear, but it’s just dumb from a PR standpoint. When it comes to the digital initiative a lot of current and former fans are pretty skeptical. Even bloggers who praise WotC’s products whenever they have the chance to, pointed out the flaws in this new plan. A happy customer is a good customer, but it seems Hasbro sees its customers more like crack addicts who will keep buying as long as the drug is provided regularly.
But seriously, I doubt that the people who are making the decisions really care. For Hasbro it all comes down to money. If the new DDI forces people to keep their subscriptions to be able to access their characters, they make more money. The old CB (and the fact that it’s almost essential to properly create characters) was the entrance drug. When you want to keep using it, you have to keep paying especially with the next 100-paged errata around the corner.
So why do I care? I don’t play D&D 4E and I don’t intend to do so in the future. But I still care, because in a way I am still emotionally invested in D&D and WotC. I loved D&D 3.5 and I bought a lot of WotC products a couple of years back. But now the company and a large part of the hobby are moving in a direction I am not comfortable with. Perhaps I am an old grognard after all.
I know free stuff is usually Youseph’s topic but I discovered this website this week and I’m thrilled. As you doubtlessly know I’m a Pathfinder RPG fan and have run a weekly game for the past year. Even if I don’t play D&D 4th edition I can tell you many things I liked about the game, one of them was the ability, with the DDI, of printing power cards. I’ve wanted something similar for spells for Pathfinder for a while now. I know there are commercially available sets in RPGNow but I was reluctant to spend money on them, some of the samples did not impress me.
Imagine my surprise when I discovered theGM.org and the handy dandy Perram’s Spellbook! This is a free application that allows you to create and print spellcards for the Pathfinder RPG, including the Advanced Players Guide and some other Paizo books! You can even create custom cards…
I love this web application! Kudos to Jefferson Jay Thacker, aka Perram, for this! Go over and check it out, it is well worth it.
A Roleplaying Games blog
If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year.
If you have an account and you log in to this site, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser.
When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select “Remember Me”, your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed.
If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.